This article is adapted from Ted's Smart Thinking podcast episode 375: The Danger of Assumptions in Your Culture: The WHAT Principle.
I want to tackle something that has been worrying me for a while now. Somewhere along the way, we forgot how to challenge information. Because of the algorithms that define our feeds, we have become myopic in how we consume knowledge.
Two words stand out to me from that statement: feed and consume. It feels like we are being fed a lot of malarkey and we are gobbling it up at rates that are genuinely unhealthy for us mentally and emotionally. I see more people snap to conclusions without curiosity every day. And that is something we need to do some smart thinking around.
The curiosity piece bothers me the most. I am amazed at how quickly people run with a rumor and then spread it with a little extra pizzazz of negativity. I never understood how anyone could find joy in that.
The Golden Age of Gossip
A few days ago, I was on a panel and someone asked me: how do we deal with negativity in media and social media, and why is this happening? My answer was simple. People are reading the headlines and the comments. They are not reading the story.
Headlines are written by editors. Their whole job is to draw you into the story, which means headlines tend to be more exciting than the actual evidence inside the article. But here is the problem: I see more and more people reading that headline, jumping to a conclusion, and then commenting as if they are an expert. They never touched the story. We may very well be living in the golden age of gossip as a result.
And this behavior? It is not staying on our phones. It is bleeding into our organizational cultures every single day. People come flying into each other's spaces, phone in hand, saying, "Can you believe this?" And without reviewing a single fact, an entire conversation begins that piles on to whatever the headline or photo shows, with opinions and zero facts. The people in the room that we like and trust get swept right along with it.
When we assume that gossip is true, things start to unravel fast. Emotional exhaustion climbs. Statistics show that negative gossip accounts for nearly 25% of why people experience burnout and anxiety. The trust gap widens. And turnover becomes a very real problem, because why would anyone stay in a place where people do not speak with generosity about others?
A Story from the Teacher's Lounge
Let me take you back to my third year of teaching in a rural Wisconsin school district. I had been moved to the middle school from the high school, and I found myself among an absolutely amazing group of people. About half the staff had worked there for 20 or more years. The other half was people like me, mid-twenties, two to four years in.
Every day, the sixth, seventh, and eighth grade teachers ate lunch together because our principal covered recess duty. For 30 minutes every day, we were all in that lounge together. And I want to be clear: teacher lounges have a reputation for a reason. Some are joyful. Some are toxic. It all depends on the leaders in the room.
Ours was led by veteran staff who had come up together, and they had a real sense of playfulness. Those lunches were never negative. We talked about each other's kids, the recipes we were reheating, how a student was doing. Someone would bring a problem to the table and we would all collaborate around it. Never once in three years did an entire lunch period get swallowed by negativity or gossip.
Then one day, that changed.
We were all unpacking our lunches when one of our most respected veteran teachers came through the door. He was beet red and angry, which was jarring because this was a six-foot-four man with a deep baritone voice who was always upbeat and positive. He grabbed his lunch out of the staff refrigerator and sat down, staring forward.
The entire room's energy dropped like the power had been turned off.
Then someone called out, "Hey, what's going on with you?" And we heard the headline.
He had heard from a high school teacher that a secret meeting had taken place, that they were going to cut the materials and supplies that had been budgeted for the new curriculum. One headline. And then all hell broke loose.
"This is so typical. They do this to us all the time." "Our principal lied to us." "We have no reason to believe anything he says." "If this is true, we should all quit."
I sat there stunned. These were people I trusted and loved, going completely wild in front of me, and not one of them had asked a single question to verify whether any of it was true.
So I got up, walked out to recess, and found the principal. I said, "Hey, is it true that there was a secret meeting and they cut the funding for the English and language arts supplies?"
He looked at me like my life was in danger. Then he smiled and said, "I'll be there in five minutes."
He came into that lounge and cleared it all up in about 60 seconds. The "secret meeting" was their routine weekly administrative meeting. The materials had not been cut. They were sitting in the garage and would be delivered that afternoon. The high school materials were late and they were considering switching vendors. That was it. That was the entire story.
The room fell silent. Then our principal looked around and said, "I'm really surprised that not one of you came to talk to me."
He turned to leave and said, "Ted, thanks for coming to get the story straight."
The door closed. Everyone sat quietly, staring at their food. And then the room erupted in laughter. They turned right around and started laying into the veteran teacher who had walked in with the headline. "You should have known that guy was full of baloney! What were you doing getting us all riled up?"
The culture shifted immediately. And then I, feeling pretty good about myself, jumped in and said, "Hey, maybe next time we should make sure the story is true before we..." A veteran teacher pointed at me and told me to shut up. The room burst into laughter again. Message received.
The gap between the headline and the comments is where the story lives. Our job is to close that gap.
The WHAT Principle
Here is the deal. Cultural assumptions are very rarely made with the best intent. When someone brings a headline into your space, your first response needs to be: What?
Not as sarcasm. As a framework. Because WHAT is actually an acronym, and it represents the action steps you need to take the moment a headline lands in front of you.
W is for Wonder. Wonder about the headline and the intent of the person sharing it.
H is for Help. Help yourself by being curious and asking questions instead of jumping to the comments.
A is for Acquire. Acquire the facts.
T is for Truth. So that T can be True. Truth-focused communications, moving forward.
Wonder. Help. Acquire. Truth. That is WHAT. And here are a few ways to apply it.
Source to Signal: Filter the Noise
In physics, noise is unwanted interference. In leadership, gossip is the noise that drowns out the signal, which is the truth. To move past it, you have to train yourself and your team to filter information based on its proximity to the source.
When someone presents a narrative, ask: "Were you in the room when this happened? Or are you reporting on the weather from someone else's window?"
That question alone shifts the focus from the content of the gossip to the credibility of it. We are looking for primary sources, not "I overheard."
Fill the Vacuum
Gossip thrives in a vacuum. If there is a gap in communication, people will fill it with their own fears, insecurities, and assumptions. That is exactly what happened in that teacher's lounge.
The strategy here is radical transparency: over-communicate the why. When a decision is made, do not just share the result. Share the logic and the evidence used to get there. Human beings are meaning-making machines. If we cannot see the story, we will create one. And the story we create is almost never the real one.
Leaders who fill those communication gaps with verified facts leave no room for fiction to take root. You effectively starve the gossip of the oxygen it needs to burn.
Deploy the Curiosity Correction
When you encounter someone reacting to misinformation, do not meet their heat with more heat. Diffuse it. Pivot from a defensive posture to a curious one. Try saying: "That is an interesting perspective. Help me understand the data point that led you to that conclusion."
You are not calling them a liar. You are not calling them out publicly. You are simply asking for the blueprints of their logic. Help me understand how you built this building. This forces the individual to realize they are holding a narrative built on sand, and it does so with dignity intact on both sides.
Build a Circle of Evidence
Leaders are often swayed by the loudest voice in the room. And if the loudest voice is only dealing in headlines, we have a problem. The antidote is your own personal board of directors: a trusted group of people who share your values and will give you the unvarnished truth when you need it.
I do this all the time. I will be driving in the car, start to feel nervous about something, and I will text a friend: "You got a minute? I have something I want to run past you." Sometimes they tell me I am way off base. Sometimes they confirm I should dig a little deeper. Either way, I am growing. I am testing my narrative against people who will push back before I go running with a headline.
Check your headline against the facts with people you trust before you comment on anything.
Time to Buffalo into the Storm
Let me close with this. Gossip is juicy for a reason. It lets us shift our worries onto something external and find a believable distraction. Sometimes, honestly, gossip about other people makes us feel a little better about ourselves. But that is all it is: a distraction. An assumption dressed up as truth. And when left unchallenged, it takes on a life of its own and becomes cultural fact.
So stop it.
Live the WHAT principle. Wonder about the headline and the intent behind it. Help yourself by staying curious and asking questions. Acquire the facts. Focus on the truth. And then communicate from that truth.
Be the one who steps away when those conversations start running hot. Be the one who walks out to recess to get the real story. Be the one who influences others to ask WHAT instead of just piling on.
The truth is never found on the front end of the storm. It is found on the journey through it. So get to it, get through it, and just ask: What?
Smart Thinking Reflection Questions
Here are three questions to sit with this week:
What do you need to do differently in order to live the WHAT principle? How do you typically respond when someone brings you a headline and jumps straight to the comments? And what stories do you need to do a better job of sharing so that the headlines in your organization can be correctly written and the comments that follow are actually supportive?
That is smart thinking.
Ted Neitzke is a lifetime educator and has served at high levels of leadership in schools in the United States. Ted is known for his work with employee engagement, strategic planning, and solutions for the workplace. His focus on collaboration and process have allowed for others to find success. Ted is a nationally recognized motivational speaker and works with organizations to support their success. His leadership has supported international recognition in employee engagement, regional recognition in strategic excellence, and local recognition for service and non-profit support. Ted is the creator and host of The Smart Thinking Podcast; a weekly podcast filled with stories and processes to support leadership everywhere.

Comments